Name of the project “the EGO” (lat.- I) is not by accident, it reflects the basic purpose of education in the students, future critics and the art critic, one of the most important qualities of the profession – ‘s own opinion on the issues of theory and practice of the art, promotion and capacity building for the formulation and non-standard decision of the arts and art- critical issues. Of particular importance in the implementation of the the project has a preliminary stage – preparation of students to the conference, the selection of topics for reports, the collection of material, work in new computer programs. Thus, students receive an additional master-class from a leading expert, that allows them to withstand the high level of presentation the investigated problem. Starting with 2006, was organized by the ten conferences, the topics of which included the most topical issues of Russian art. “Ego I. who was in love Narcissus?” – the first conference of the in the cycle. Although the topics selected by the participants, is not raised problems of the theory or practice of the art, however they gave the possibility to the students to demonstrate individual vision. We can say that the free discussion of such events, such as time, silence, mentality, became the basis for the the emancipation of the approach to the issue. Positive results are visible already at the next conference “Ego II. Артскоп: creativity Дж.Умарбекова”, where were set specific artistic tasks. The participants expressed their subjective opinion about different aspects of creativity (coloring, lyrics, folklore, national spirit and etc.) famous masters of national painting. The third under the account of the round-table was devoted to one of the the issue, which is located at the intersection of philosophy, Culturology and art history. “Ego III. Aesthetics void in И.Бродnursing. The projection of the modern art” – so was called the conference, dedicated to the problem of emptiness as an aesthetic category. The range of understanding of emptiness is very wide – from moral-psychological (poverty of spirit, emptiness) to plastic (the blank space in the works of art). Many works of the world and domestic art suggest that the interpretation of the aesthetic properties of the empty space gives them a special meaning and the style. The curator was tasked to consider the art of XX century from the point of view of reflecting the themes of emptiness, the basis of complex poetic texts of the famous poet, laureate of the The Nobel prize And. Brodsky. The students was considered an extensive material of art, from paintings To. Malevich to paintings of Russian artists, from Japanese interiors to traditional applied art of Uzbekistan. It is enough actual theme of the next conference – “Ego IV. Contemporary art: from handicraft to the philosophy of”associated with growing contemporary art in the process of philosophical comprehension of reality. Although trends in the domestic art criticism, associated with the need to address artistic practice in a wider theoretical context, there are still in the middle of the XX C., this topic was not enough fully analyzed art critic. During the the round table discussed the philosophical aspects of modern art, its new forms (performance, photography, advertising), philosophical symbolism of applied art, creative artists of 3. Sharipova, J.. Usmanov, F. Akhmadaliev, etc. The image of a woman – the leitmotif of the entire world of art. As this topic is covered in modern art of Uzbekistan, demonstrated exhibition “moon-face”, held in November 2008. Exposition of this exhibition was the subject of a the discussion of the next scientific and experimental conference “Ego V. Moon-face: the new tendencies in the modern art of Uzbekistan”. The rapporteurs appreciated plastic the decision of the authors of the works and shared their impressions of the the overall concept of the exhibition project. Slightly different was the angle of the conference “the Ego VI. Culture and the art of Tashkent and regions of Uzbekistan”, devoted to the 2200th anniversary of Tashkent city. In addition, before students there was a task to show the artistic diversity of all regions of Uzbekistan, as reflected in the content of the reports. Most of the presentations was devoted to the brief the characteristic of the traditional artistic crafts Uzbekistan’s regions, but there were reports dedicated to the well the creativity of contemporary artists. The theme of the seventh under the account of the Round table was devoted to the the discussion was held in October 2009. V Tashkent International Biennale of contemporary art. “Ego VII. On the trail of Tashkent Biennale” aroused great interest among the students, because it was connected with the latest trends modern Russian and world art. Students independently chose the topics of the reports, which in the end were devoted to the analysis of works of participants of the Biennale, received the main prizes and diplomas of the national participants of the project “Turkestan remake of” (B. Ismailov, With. Rakhmetov, T. Akhmedov, Dr.. Razikov, F. Ahmadaliev, 3. Sharipov, etc.), and also prize-winners of the Biennale – Akbar Бехкалам (Germany), Maria Соларек (Poland), Сетеней Озбек (Turkey). An important objective of this activities – finding in the process of preparation for conference experience of the analysis of works of contemporary art of various types and forms – painting, installations, video art. If part of the previous conference was devoted to the already successful exhibition projects, the “Ego VIII. Cow Aristotle” itself gave impetus to the creation of the exposition. Tasks the round table were associated with the Aristotelian interpretation of the teaching about мимесисе – concept, which States the absolute the value of imitation the artist nature. Aristotle emphasized the importance of compliance with the real shapes and sizes in the image of the phenomena of nature and animals. To the participants of the the conference set a task to find in the fine the art of examples антимиметической interpretation of animals and make artistic and critical analysis of such works. As a result there were studied the paintings of huge spectrum – from examples of Patriotic to samples of the world painting. According to the results of the Round table was the head of the proposed exhibition project “Mystery of Aristotle”, the opening which took place in October 2010 in the frame of Art Week Tashkent. The participants of the exhibition were invited to focus on the expression of one topic image of a cow, which they interpreted in unrealistic forms and sizes. This experience showed, how useful for art may be similar actions not only in theoretical terms, but also in the practical. The theme of the ninth to the account of the discussion became another philosophical concept, having artistic reflection in the the world of art. The participants of the “Ego GC. Aesthetics of hedonism in the art of Uzbekistan ” interested in the interpretation of hedonism in the works of contemporary local artists. The relevance of the topic given the circumstance, that is in the works on the history of arts and contemporary artistic practice Uzbekistan this phenomenon almost was never researched, although as a socio-cultural the phenomenon of hedonism today is not only covers the segments of the public and personal life, but finds fairly frequent reflected in art. The students tried to cover the wide tonal range of this problem is from the “ethical” hedonism to извращенно-epicurean, from “gross” to “soft”, from decadence to lyrical intonations of philosophy of pleasure. The latest at the time of writing this articles of the scientific-experimental students ‘ conference “the Ego X. Mimesis in the art of Uzbekistan. Human history” was not so much a scientific, how many artistic nature. The original idea and the theme of The round table were connected with the conduct of Tashkent international festival of contemporary cinema in September – October 2011. The participants of the conference could of your choice analyze portrait and, proceeding from features of character the hero, his inner world, to suggest a story or a story, which have occurred or could occur with the character. In this case all the stories are true – heard once from friends or deemed to close them people. This reflects the concept of the theory of mimesis, the the topic of the conference. The presented history had the opportunity to become the basis for the scenario of a short film and be submitted for participation in the contest referred to the film festival. In connection with this, in the framework of the conference work the jury consisting of leading film Directors, actors, theater, film critics and art historians, which took a decision to the recommendations from three of the most interesting stories as the scenario for staging a short film. It is worth noting that with the assistance of the Academy of fine arts Uzbekistan and management НИХД them. To. Behzad materials the mentioned conferences were published in a separate collections and received high assessment from the experts, becoming a kind of a methodical manual for students of higher educational institutions. Materials of these publications will be useful and interesting not only for students of special art educational institutions, artists, art historians, but also for a wide range of admirers of fine and applied art. Thus, the preparatory papers, presentations, reports and the next phase of the publication of steel a good school for the future specialists. We can say with certainty that under the guidance of Professor Akbar Khakimov brought up a new generation of art critics, already with the educational stage understand all the the importance of independence and free non-standard thinking, as well as who can appropriately and competently defend its position. These conferences have become a kind of embodiment of the historically the unique, traditional systems “Ustoz-shogird” in its modern format.